Friday, September 5, 2014

LAD #1: Mayflower Compact & Fundamental Orders of Connecticut

LAD #1: Mayflower Compact & Fundamental Orders of Connecticut

1. What concepts are included in the Mayflower Compact?
  • The beginning traces of self-rule and government based on consent of the governed are prominent concepts included in this document. This laid down the foundation for democracy to grow as the colonies expanded, and eventually other documents in US history, like the Constitution, model themselves after the Mayflower Compact. Despite this democratic aspect of the document, it still pledges loyalty to the English throne. Lastly, the concept of faith in God is clearly displayed. 
2. How does the Mayflower Compact reflect and attach to both the "Old" and "New" worlds?
  • Remnants from Old World mentality are still clearly visible in both the colonists' undying faith in God and their steadfast loyalty to the crown of England. However, the colonists moved away from the Old World autocratic government style and towards a new government whose power is derived from the people.
3. How did the Fundamental Order of Connecticut differ from the Mayflower Compact?
  • The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were written with the intent of creating a more permanent form of government, while the Mayflower Compact was written to keep the settlers in order, or prevent any reckless activity. The Fundamental Orders created a strong local government, and the Mayflower Compact was more of a makeshift government to retain order among colonists. 
4. What prompted the colonists of Connecticut to take this approach to government, i.e.: use of a written Constitution?
  • Since several towns were to be made into one unified body, this required a stronger government. In addition, colonists wanted a more permanent and united form of government. A written constitution would ultimately lead to a strong and lasting government.
5. In what significant way(s) does the Fundamental Orders reflect a fear of and safeguard against the usurping of power by one person or a chosen few?
  • Officials were to be elected by people in elections, according to the Fundamental Orders. Also, the powers of government were limited, so that it would be impossible for one person or a select few to seize all power. 

No comments:

Post a Comment